A higher education IT-focused report highlights a core challenge created by agentic AI tools that can operate LMS accounts on students’ behalf. The piece points to the Einstein tool’s controversy—where AI could purportedly log into Canvas, watch lectures, draft papers, and submit work without professors knowing—as a “big wake-up call” for campuses’ ability to distinguish human students from AI agents. California State University’s CISO is cited describing the problem as an identification and verification gap that higher ed systems have not solved reliably across major learning management systems. The article’s emphasis is practical: AI proctoring and integrity policies can’t rely solely on assignment prompts or generic detection when authentication and activity tracking don’t differentiate student identity from automated processes. For institutions, the report suggests the next phase of academic integrity efforts may need stronger identity assurance, tighter access controls, and better auditability of student actions inside LMS environments.