Faculty at Arizona State University raised governance concerns about a new web-based AI course builder described as “Frankensteinian,” warning that the tool’s design and access controls create risk for academic content and student protections. The reporting says ASU debuted the application quietly and that faculty—whose materials the AI pulls from—question how the system works and who can access it. The controversy centers on course content ingestion and downstream use of faculty-generated materials. Faculty oversight is particularly consequential in courseware systems where the boundaries between instruction, assessment, and automated content assembly can affect academic integrity and institutional accountability. The next steps for ASU are likely to involve clarifying system behavior, access permissions, and faculty consent practices, especially if the tool is expanded beyond pilot use. The reporting frames the dispute as less about whether AI is used and more about how control and transparency are established in curriculum development.