Arizona State University faculty are raising concerns that a new AI platform, Atomic (a subscription service), is being used to scrape and repurpose course materials without faculty input. Professors say it is surfacing decontextualized lecture snippets and producing summaries they describe as error-prone, creating accuracy and intellectual-property risks for instruction. The issue highlights an emerging governance gap as universities adopt AI tools faster than they can establish faculty controls over what content is ingested and how it is presented to students. The faculty backlash centers on who gets to approve the inputs, what guardrails exist, and whether output quality is being validated before deployment.