In higher education, new agentic AI tools are intensifying disputes over academic integrity and IT accountability, as campuses struggle to distinguish student work from autonomous systems acting on their behalf. A new case highlights the practical gap: tools that can log into learning platforms, monitor lectures, draft assignments, and submit work can undermine institutions’ ability to verify authorship with existing LMS controls. The report frames the issue as a core cybersecurity and governance challenge rather than a purely academic policy problem, emphasizing that even vendor-managed platforms and third-party integrations complicate auditing. Campuses are increasingly being pushed to rethink authentication, monitoring, and incident-response workflows to prevent “agent” activity from becoming indistinguishable from legitimate student behavior.