The Trump administration’s renewed push on campus antisemitism has reignited disputes at multiple universities, prompting new enforcement threats and internal reforms. Federal pressure and public scrutiny have driven trustees and administrators to announce policy changes, while some students and faculty question the motives behind the government’s actions. Columbia University — a year after a high‑profile ultimatum tied to funding and governance — has implemented some promised reforms but critics say gaps remain. Across campuses, stakeholders report mixed results: some students and faculty welcome tighter enforcement; others say the measures chill protest and academic expression. Legal experts warn the federal push could reshape campus grievance procedures, Title VI interpretation, and trustee oversight. Universities facing similar inquiries will likely have to balance compliance with academic freedom and student‑discipline norms.