A public debate has reignited over early-decision admissions after a guest essay labeled the practice an "unfair racket," drawing a wave of reader responses. Admissions directors, applicants, and advocacy groups are weighing whether early-decision programs advantage affluent and well-advised applicants and distort yield-management tactics. Colleges that rely on binding early offers may face renewed scrutiny from regulators and calls for policy reform. Enrollment officers should prepare for intensified campus conversations about transparency, socioeconomic access, and how admissions timing affects class composition and financial-aid budgeting.