Lead: Colleges report that faculty, not administrators, are leading the development of classroom AI norms as campuses confront generative tools and the next wave of agentic systems. Faculty surveys and campus reports show instructors setting expectations for appropriate AI use in coursework while academic leaders plan curriculum changes and governance structures. Higher‑education leaders are also debating the transition from generative AI assistants to 'agentic' AI — autonomous systems that can act as project managers — and what that means for pedagogy, assessment and academic integrity. Experts argue for clear, source‑based guidance and changes to learning design to preserve learning outcomes. Deans, instructional designers and IT leaders must collaborate on policy, faculty development, and assessment redesign to integrate AI responsibly. Accreditation reviewers will likely expect evidence of intentional AI integration that safeguards academic standards while preparing students for an AI‑augmented workplace.