Faculty in the University of Houston’s College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences were sent a three‑page memo asking them to affirm they do not 'indocrinate' students and that they design courses to enhance critical thinking. The memo cites guidance from university president Renu Khator and frames the pledge as consistent with Texas Senate Bill 37 requirements. Professors pushed back immediately; the local AAUP chapter urged faculty to submit conscientious‑objector language and some instructors refused to sign. College leadership said no punitive actions would follow refusal, but warned that syllabi reviews could be triggered for non‑signers. Why it matters: the episode illustrates how state legislative pressures and campus administrative directives are affecting academic freedom debates, syllabus oversight and faculty governance. The standoff may presage further litigation or bargaining disputes over course content review and faculty rights in politically charged states.