UK universities and policymakers are confronting new scrutiny around how institutions evidence research environment claims for the next Research Excellence Framework (REF 2029). Panellists finalizing guidance are increasingly concerned that narrative-based statements—now labeled “strategy, people and research environment” (SPRE)—could be “polished” in ways that complicate audits. With SPRE accounting for 20% of an institution’s overall REF score, experts have focused on what evidence can be submitted and how verification will work. A senior Russell Group professor warned that narrative submissions create temptation to present achievements in the best light, while panels are also weighing the risk of using AI to produce submissions that appear indistinguishable. The final guidance is expected in autumn, with block grant distribution estimated at around £2 billion annually. The audit debate is shaping how universities plan internal documentation, drafting workflows, and compliance checks for REF submissions.