A debate over early‑decision admissions reignited after a guest essay called the policy unfair, prompting widespread reader responses. Critics framed early decision as privileging affluent applicants and reducing access; supporters defended it as a tool for yield management and certainty for students. Admissions offices at selective colleges face renewed scrutiny over transparency and equity in early‑cycle practices. Expect renewed pressure from advocates and watchdogs for policy reviews, changes to financial‑aid disclosures, or pilot alternatives such as binding early action reforms.