New research from Grinnell College suggests some prison education programs, while well‑intentioned, may correlate with higher rates of reincarceration. The study examines program designs and post‑release outcomes, raising questions about how correctional education is structured and measured. Researchers note that program content, selection effects and the supports available to participants after release (housing, employment, counseling) influence outcomes. They caution against assuming all correctional education yields net reductions in recidivism without careful program design and integration with reentry services. For institutions and policymakers partnering with correctional systems, the findings underscore the need to evaluate not just in‑custody learning but the transition supports that link education to stable employment and reduced reoffending. Program funders and accreditation bodies may seek clearer outcome metrics and accountability for reentry success.